LONDON AS A SUMMER RESORT
            
                by William Lyon
                Phelps
            
                
                I had an interesting conversation with Bernard Shaw last week. The next day he
                and Mrs. Shaw were leaving to spend the summer on the Riviera, which from time
                immemorial has been regarded as a winter resort.He gave, as is his custom, an original and diverting explanation
                of the fact that many now prefer to visit winter resorts in the summer.It is a matter of clothes. The Victorians
                were forced to go to cool places, or at any rate to avoid warm places; because
                they were compelled to wear stuffy clothes, the men being encased in frock
                coats, thick waistcoats, collars and swaddling neckcloths. But today, when one
                leaves off almost everything, the finest place in the world, according to G. B.
                S., is a climate where one can live outdoors in comfort, day and night.It is certainly true that many European resorts,
                where the hotels used to be open only during a short winter season, now
                attract visitors the year round.  The
                converse is also true.   
                
                    I
            
                can
                well remember when the great hotels of Switzerland-the playground of
                Europe-were open only during the summer; and were crowded only during the month
                of August. But now they never close and are as much sought after in December
                and January as in the good old summertime. The same is true of Lake Placid in
                America and of many other places. People in Victorian times were forced to
                dress according to the prevailing style, which bore no reference to climate or
                common sense; remember how the women used to look, playing golf and term is!
                
                    Furt
            
                hermore
                the old
            idea
                that
            
                everyone who could afford it must leave the city
                during the "heated term" has become obsolete, even in America.
                President Harper of the University of Chicago established a Summer Quarter, and
                professors who wished to do so could take their three months' vacation in the
                winter, a privilege that many continue to enjoy. The Country clubs and golf
                have had much to do with the contentment of business men who remain in cities
                during the summer. As a matter of fact, the city is not at all a bad place, I
                mean, of course, for those who can afford to snake themselves comfortable.
                
                    The city of Munich has for many
                years been a Mecca for summer pilgrims.  The
                season of music, arranged for foreign visitors, reaches its climax in August.Now I wish to urge the millions of
                Americans who at one time or another cross the ocean to consider the merits of
                London as a summer resort.
                
                    For over a hundred years July has
                been a part of the London "season"; Parliament is in session, operas
                and theatres are open, and parties flourish amain. The twelfth of August, the
                opening of the grouse shooting season, is the formal beginning of the vacation;
                Parliament always adjourns for it, and London society flies north. But to an
                American London is day by day interesting, and there should be no closing of
                any season for him.
                
                    London has no prolonged hot weather,
                like St. Louis. It has been said that the English climate consists of eight
                months of winter, and four months of bad weather.This is an exaggeration.
                Every now and then there is a year when summer is omitted; but even in
                such an unfortunate time, one is better off in London than in the country. In
                fact, to an American London, while not the most beautiful city in the world, is
                assuredly the most interesting.  It is
                inexhaustible.  Every foot of it, to one
                well read in English literature, is hallowed ground; I think
            
                I could walk along Fleet street a thousand days in
                succession, and always receive a thrill.
                
                I wish that every American journalist, every American book reviewer, every
                American drama critic, would spend a month in London and diligently read the
                morning newspapers, such as
            
                The Times, The Telegraph, The Morning Post.
            
                Every page seems to be written for intelligent readers.
                These London journalists review tennis, golf and cricket matches with more
                dignity than the average New Yorker reviews plays and books. One reason that
                militates steadily against intellectual progress in America is the fact that
                apparently we have no language suitable as a medium for the exchange of ideas.
                Our book reviews and our drama criticisms are too often written in a cheap kind
                of slang that is intended to be smart.
                If anyone imagines that the journalism of London loses in intensity by
                being written in suitable English, let him turn to a file of
            
                The London Times
            
                and read the story of Tilden playing tennis at Wimbledon.
                
                    A remarkable thing about literary
                society in London is that age has nothing to do with it. One meets in social
                gatherings men and women in the twenties and in the eighties-disparity in years
                seems to be forgotten.  
                
                    One should remember that, owing to
                the small size of England, one can use London as a base of operations and take
                excursions into the country on the swift English trains, returning to London
                every evening; many happy, baggageless days have I spent in this manner.
                
                    When G. K. Chesterton was in
                America, I asked him what difference between the two countries impressed him
                most. Instantly he replied, "Your wooden houses." I had never
                thought of them as curiosities, but one does not see them in England.The thing that to me is most noticeable on
                the London streets is the absence of straw hats.There are many more bare male heads than there are straw
                hats.  It is almost impossible to
                attract attention in London, but a straw hat will come nearest to doing the
                trick. Some men are exquisitely and others strangely clad, and nobody
                cares.  I saw a man riding a bicycle.He had on tan shoes, homespun trousers, a
                frock coat, and a tall silk hat.